[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 22 (Autumn 2018) ::
3 2018, 6(22): 9-24 Back to browse issues page
A Comparison of Governance Model in Team and Individual Sport Federations
Ghasem Mehrabi 1, Seyyed Nasrollah Sajadi2 , Majid Jalali Farahani3
1- Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , gh.mehrabii@ut.ac.ir
2- Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3905 Views)
The aim of this study was to compare the governance model in team and individual sport federations. Methods of this study was descriptive-survey and C-OAR-SE procedure was used to design the questionnaire. 11 expert commented on content validity of the questionnaire with CVI & CVR and the reliability was confirmed using communality test. Stakeholders of 8 football, volleyball, basketball, handball, wrestling, taekwondo, weightlifting and judo federations were selected as the statistical population. 305 subjects were selected as the sample. SPSS23 and SMART-PLS3 (SEM) were used to analyze the data. According the findings, governance model in team and individual sport federations had a good quality. Although the path coefficient of the effect of factors on the concept of governance in the governance model of team and individual sport federations was different, this difference was not statistically significant. Thus, given the environmental conditions (economic, social, etc.) in the governing body of the federations in Iran, it seems that the governance model is not much different in federations.
Keywords: C-OAR-SE procedure, federation, governance, individual sport, team sport
Full-Text [PDF 262 kb]   (1549 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. 3. Ahmadzadeh, A., Dousti, M., Farzan, F. (2012). “Identifying of sport cultural challenges in Iran” (Case study: Mazandaran province)”. International Journal of Sport Studies, 2, pp: 250-254.
2. 4. Australian Sports Commission. (2012). “Sports governance principles”. Available from: http://www.ausport.gov.au.
3. 5. Camy, J., Robinson, L. (2007). “Managing Olympic sport organizations”. Human Kinetics, North Shore City, New Zealand, pp: 1-230.
4. 6. Chappelet, J. L., Mrkonjic, M. (2013). “Basic indicators for better governance in international sport (BIBGIS): An assessment tool for international sport governing bodies”. Working Paper, School of Public Administration, University of Lausanne, Swiss, pp: 1-55.
5. 7. Chappelet, J., Kübler-Mabbott, B. (2008). “The International Olympic Committee and the Olympic system: the governance of world sport”. Routledge Global Institutions the CUNY Graduate Center, New York, pp: 1-230.
6. 8. Commonwealth Games Federation. (2006). “Constitution, regulations, code of conduct”. Commonwealth Games Federation, London. Available from: http://www.thecgf.com.
7. 9. Council of the European ::union::. (2013). “Principles of good governance in sport”. Under the EU Work Plan for Sport for 2011-2014, Brussels, pp: 1-32.
8. 10.Dutch Olympic Committee (NOC & NSF). (2005). “13 points of advice good sport governance code”. Report to Netherlands Institute for Social Research, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp: 5-7.
9. 11.European Team Sports Association. (2008). “Good governance by sports federations”. Safeguarding the Heritage and Future of Team Sport Conference, Brussels, Belgium, pp: 3-9.
10. 12.Geeraert, A. (2013). “AGGIS: Limits to the autonomy of sport: EU law”. A report as a part of the project Action for Good Governance in International Sports Organizations (AGGIS), Play the Game/ Danish Institute for Sports Studies, Copenhagen, pp: 151-184.
11. 13.Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2011). “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet”. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, pp: 139-151.
12. 14.Henry, I., Lee, P. (2004). “Governance and ethics in sport”. In: J. Beech & S. Chadwick (Eds.). The Business of Sports Management. FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, pp: 25–41.
13. 15.Hoye, R., Cuskelly, G. (2007). “Sport governance”. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, UK, pp: 1-204.
14. 16.International Olympic Committee. (2008). “Basic universal principles of good governance of the Olympic and sports movement”. Documents of Seminar Autonomy of Olympic and Sport Movement, Lausanne, Swiss, pp: 1-12.
15. 17.Jennings, A. (2006). “Foul! The secret world of FIFA: bribes, vote-rigging and ticket scandals”. Harper Collins, London, pp: 53-71.
16. 18.Kleining, G. (1995). “Qualitative-heuristic social research: writings on theory and practice”. Rolf Fechner Verlag, Druck, Hamburg, pp: 120-143.
17. 19.Lam, E. (2014). “The roles of governance in sport organizations”. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 2(2), pp: 19-31.
18. 20.Laugblin, F. L., Andringa, R. C. (2007). “Good governance for nonprofits: developing principles and policies for an effective board”. American Management Association, New York, pp: 1-207.
19. 21.Lawshe C. H. (1975). “A quantitative approach to content validity”. Personnel Psychology, 28, pp: 563-575.
20. 22.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). “OECD principles of corporate governance”. OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, Paris, pp: 1-61.
21. 23.Parent M. M. (2016). “Stakeholder perceptions on the democratic governance of major sports events”. Sport Management Review, 19, pp: 402–416.
22. 24.Rossiter, J. R. (2002). “The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing”. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, pp: 305–335.
23. 25.Shilbury, D. A., O’Boyle, I. A., Ferkins, L. B. (2016). “Towards a research agenda in collaborative sport governance”. Sport Management Review, 367, pp: 1–13.
24. 26.Sports and Recreation Alliance (UK). (2011). “Voluntary code of good governance for the sport and recreation sector”. Victoria House, London, pp: 1-39.
25. 27.Waltz, C. F., Bausell, R. B. (1981). “Nursing research: Design, statistics and computer analysis”. F.A. Davis Co Publisher, University of Michigan, Philadelphia, pp: 1-145.
Send email to the article author

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mehrabi G, Sajadi S N, Jalali Farahani M. A Comparison of Governance Model in Team and Individual Sport Federations. 3 2018; 6 (22) :9-24
URL: http://ntsmj.issma.ir/article-1-1169-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 22 (Autumn 2018) Back to browse issues page
رویکردهایی نوین در مدیریت ورزشی New Trends in Sport Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 35 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645