[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 12 (Spring 2016) ::
3 2016, 4(12): 9-21 Back to browse issues page
An Evaluation of Physical Education Teachers' Performance Using 720-Degree Feedback
Abstract:   (36403 Views)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of physical education teachers with 720-degree feedback. The population consisted of principals, teachers of physical education and other courses, sports authorities in area 7 in Department of Education, managers and experts in Sport and Youth office of northeast Tehran, students of 15 high schools for girls in area 7 of Tehran and their parents (N=6371). 769 subjects were selected as the sample by census, purposive, simple random and cluster random sampling methods. To achieve aims of this study, Physical Education Teacher Performance Evaluation Questionnaire by Keshavarz et al. (2013) was used. For data analysis, descriptive and inferential statistical methods such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-sample t test, two Hotelling T2 test and LSD post hoc test with SPSS software were used. Results showed a significant difference between the first and second stages of performance (P˂0.05). It is necessary for physical education authorities of Ministry of Education to use new models of performance evaluation which have the facility for evaluating PE teachers' performance from different perspectives so that the level of these teachers and the productivity of the sports and physical education classes can be improved.

Keywords: assessment, performance, teacher, physical education, 720-degree feedback
Full-Text [PDF 607 kb]   (3401 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Aggarwal, A., Thakur, G. S. M. (2013). “Techniques of performance appraisal-a review”. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(3), pp: 617-621.
2. Angus , H. (2012). “Improving physical education in primary schools”. A report by HM Inspectorate of Education, Scottish, England, p: 9.
3. Armitage, J. W., Brooks, N. A., Carlen, M. C., Schulz, S. P. (2006). “Remodeling leadership: developing mature leaders and organizational leadership systems (an introduction to the Leadership Maturity Model™)”. Performance Improvement, 45(2), pp: 40-47.
4. Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2008). “Organisational practices and the post-retirement employment experience of older workers”. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), pp: 36-53.
5. Association, N. M. S. (2003). “This we believe: Successful schools for young adolescents: A position paper of the National Middle School Association”. National Middle School Association, Executive Parkway, Westerville, p: 1.
6. Curtis, B. J., Zraly, C. B., Marenda, D. R., Dingwall, A. K. (2011). “Histone lysine demethylases function as co-repressors of SWI/SNF remodeling activities during Drosophila wing development”. Developmental Biology, 350(2), pp: 534-547.
7. Dančíková, V., Antala, B. (2011). “School managers’ opinions about physical and sport education of boys and girls”. Paper at the 6th Fiep European Congress, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia, pp: 116-122.
8. Dulababu, T., Mary Ninu, T. D., Anupama, D. (2011). “The need of ‘720 degree performance appraisal’ in the ne economy companies”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(4), pp: 39-50.
9. Harrop, W. (2009). “Reverification is the new revalidation- More change in GMC palnes”. Anaesthesia News, 261, p: 88.
10. Longwell, J. (2010). “Combining leadership and community development”. World Link, 20(2), p: 5.
11. Mckenzie, T. L., Catellier, D. J., Conway, T., Lytle, L. A., Grieser, M., Webber, L. A., Pratt, C. A., Elder, J. P. (2006). “Girls' activity levels and lesson contexts in middle school PE: TAAG baseline”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise (MSSE), 38(7), p: 1229-35.
12. National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE). (2009). “A quality physical education program will keep your school fit to achieve”. 10th Edition. An Association of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Reston, VA, USA. Available from: www.aahperd.org/naspe.
13. Sacli, F. D., Demirhan, G. (2011). “Comparison the critical thinking skill levels of students in physical education teacher education coaching, and recreation programs”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 41, pp: 372-385.
14. Sanna, P., Pilvikki, H. J. (2013). “The influence of teachers education on the pedagogical thinking of physical education pre-service teachers”. Department of Sport Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, p: 33.
15. Shrestha, S., Chalidabhongse, J. (2007). “Improving employee performance appraisal method through web-based appraisal support system: system development from the study on Thai companies”. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 90(10), pp: 1621-1629.
16. Smallwood, N. (2005). “Intangibles irrupt into HR and leadership development”. Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain, p: 8.
17. Smith , S. M. C. (2010). “Impact of different types of knowledge on two preserves teachers’ ability to learn and deliver the Sport Education model”. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), pp: 243–256.
18. Weinberg, R. S., Gould, D. (2014). “Foundations of sport and exercise psychology: 6th edition with web study guide”. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, p: 38.
19. Weiss, G. (2004). “How to give and receive employee feedback: Tell staffers early and often how they performing, and listen to their job-related concerns”. Medical Economical, 81(10), p:78.


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

An Evaluation of Physical Education Teachers' Performance Using 720-Degree Feedback. 3 2016; 4 (12) :9-21
URL: http://ntsmj.issma.ir/article-1-629-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 12 (Spring 2016) Back to browse issues page
رویکردهایی نوین در مدیریت ورزشی New Trends in Sport Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645