1. 16.Avenarius, H. (1993). “Introduction: image and public relations practice”. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5(2), pp: 65-70. 2. 17.De Coninck, B. J. (2010). “The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust”. Journal of Business research, 63(12), pp: 1349-1355. 3. 18.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., Sowa, D. (1986). “Perceived organizational support”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp: 51-59. 4. 19.Griffin, M. L., Hogan, N. L., Lambert, E. G. (2012). “Doing people work in the prison setting an examination of the job characteristics model and correctional staff burnout”. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), pp: 1131-1147. 5. 20.Islam, T., Khan, S. R., Ahmad, N. U. B., Ali, G., Ahmed, I., Bowra, Z. A. (2013). “Turnover Intentions: The influence of perceived organizational support and organizational commitment”. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, pp: 1238-1242. 6. 21.Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y., Moffit, M. A. (2001). “Institutional image: A case study”. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(4), pp: 205-216. 7. 22.Kerjcie, R. V., Morgan, D. W. (1970). “Determining sample size for research activities”. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, pp: 607-610. 8. 23.LeBlanc, G., Nguyen, N. (1996). “Cues used by customers evaluating corporate image in service firms”. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7, pp: 47-59. 9. 24.Leenu, N., Lakhwinder, S. (2012). “Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between practices and organizational trust”. Global Business Review, 13, pp: 239-249. 10. 25.Lin, S. J. J., Lin, C. S. (2011). “Moderating effect of organizational climate on the relationship of organizational support and service oriented organizational citizenship behaviors”. African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), pp: 582-595. 11. 26.Rocha, C. M., Turner, B. A. (2008). “Organizational effectiveness of athletic departments and coaches’ extra role behavior”. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 1, pp: 124-144.
|